Scalefresh AI

Agentic AI

Services

Architechture

Use case

Insights

Contact Us

Scalefresh AI

Scalefresh AI

Your physicians won't trust AI that makes decisions without them.
They shouldn't.

AI agents can synthesize clinical data and draft documentation in minutes. But they shouldn't finalize anything without physician or staff approval. That's human-in-the-loop design. And it's not optional in healthcare.

Tell me more about this

Tell me more about this

Tell me more about this

man in blue crew neck t-shirt smiling

What Is Human-in-the-Loop?

Human-in-the-Loop places clinical and administrative staff at critical decision points in AI workflows, ensuring judgment, safety, and accountability remain where they belong.

The agent does the coordination and drafting.

Your staff does the verification and approval.

Human-in-the-Loop places clinical and administrative staff at critical decision points in AI workflows, ensuring judgment, safety,

and accountability remain

where they belong.

The agent does the

coordination and drafting.

Your staff does the verification

and approval.

Without HITL vs. With HITL:

01.

Prior Authorization Processing

Without HITL: AI generates prior authorization → submits to payer → staff finds out later

With HITL: AI generates prior authorization → staff reviews and approves → AI submits to payer


01.

Prior Authorization and Administrative Automation

Without HITL: AI generates prior authorization → submits to payer → staff finds out later

With HITL: AI generates prior authorization → staff reviews and approves → AI submits to payer


01.

Prior Authorization and Administrative Automation

Without HITL: AI generates prior authorization → submits to payer → staff finds out later

With HITL: AI generates prior authorization → staff reviews and approves → AI submits to payer


02.

Clinical Documentation Review

Without HITL: AI extracts diagnosis codes from notes → codes flow directly to billing → denials surface weeks later

With HITL: AI suggests diagnosis codes → clinician verifies against clinical context → approved codes move to billing


02.

Clinical Documentation Review

Without HITL: AI extracts diagnosis codes from notes → codes flow directly to billing → denials surface weeks later

With HITL: AI suggests diagnosis codes → clinician verifies against clinical context → approved codes move to billing


02.

Clinical Documentation Review

Without HITL: AI extracts diagnosis codes from notes → codes flow directly to billing → denials surface weeks later

With HITL: AI suggests diagnosis codes → clinician verifies against clinical context → approved codes move to billing


03.

Medication Reconciliation

Without HITL: AI reconciles medication lists across systems → updates patient record automatically → discrepancies discovered at point of care

With HITL: AI flags discrepancies between medication sources → pharmacist or nurse reviews conflicts → confirmed list updates patient record


03.

Medication Reconciliation

Without HITL: AI reconciles medication lists across systems → updates patient record automatically → discrepancies discovered at point of care

With HITL: AI flags discrepancies between medication sources → pharmacist or nurse reviews conflicts → confirmed list updates patient record


03.

Medication Reconciliation

Without HITL: AI reconciles medication lists across systems → updates patient record automatically → discrepancies discovered at point of care

With HITL: AI flags discrepancies between medication sources → pharmacist or nurse reviews conflicts → confirmed list updates patient record


04.

AI Agent Escalation (Complex Cases)

Without HITL: Review agent encounters gaps in data → retries analysis → exceeds retry limit → process stalls with no resolution

With HITL: Review agent encounters gaps in data → sends back to analysis agent → retry limit reached → escalates to human specialist who resolves ambiguity and completes workflow


04.

AI Agent Escalation (Complex Cases)

Without HITL: Review agent encounters gaps in data → retries analysis → exceeds retry limit → process stalls with no resolution

With HITL: Review agent encounters gaps in data → sends back to analysis agent → retry limit reached → escalates to human specialist who resolves ambiguity and completes workflow


04.

AI Agent Escalation (Complex Cases)

Without HITL: Review agent encounters gaps in data → retries analysis → exceeds retry limit → process stalls with no resolution

With HITL: Review agent encounters gaps in data → sends back to analysis agent → retry limit reached → escalates to human specialist who resolves ambiguity and completes workflow


05.

Radiology Findings Summarization

Without HITL: AI summarizes imaging findings → summary appears in patient chart → radiologist unaware AI handled interpretation

With HITL: AI drafts findings summary → radiologist reviews against images → radiologist approves or edits before chart insertion


05.

Radiology Findings Summarization

Without HITL: AI summarizes imaging findings → summary appears in patient chart → radiologist unaware AI handled interpretation

With HITL: AI drafts findings summary → radiologist reviews against images → radiologist approves or edits before chart insertion


05.

Radiology Findings Summarization

Without HITL: AI summarizes imaging findings → summary appears in patient chart → radiologist unaware AI handled interpretation

With HITL: AI drafts findings summary → radiologist reviews against images → radiologist approves or edits before chart insertion


Staff maintain control over clinical and administrative outcomes while AI handles preparation, analysis, and execution.

Staff maintain control over clinical and administrative outcomes while AI handles preparation, analysis, and execution.

HITL transforms AI from autonomous decision-maker to intelligent assistant.

HITL transforms AI from autonomous decision-maker to intelligent assistant.

Three Reasons Healthcare Can't Deploy
AI Without HITL

Three Reasons Healthcare Can't Deploy AI Without HITL

Reason 1: Legal and Professional Liability

Physicians and clinical staff are legally accountable for documentation and clinical decisions under state medical practice laws. You cannot delegate this accountability to software.


If an AI-generated prior authorization contains clinically inappropriate justification and gets approved, leading to a treatment that harms the patient, who's liable?


Not the AI. Not the vendor. The physician whose name is on the authorization.

HITL preserves accountability. Physician reviews the AI-generated documentation, verifies clinical appropriateness, and approves. Now the physician is accountable for a decision they actually reviewed, not one an algorithm made autonomously.

Reason 2: Clinical Nuance AI Can't Capture

AI agents work with structured data in your EHR. But clinical judgment often relies on unstructured context:

  • Patient mentioned during bedside rounds that symptoms improved after medication adjustment (not documented in progress note yet)

  • Clinician palpated a mass that hasn't been formally documented

  • Patient has social determinants affecting treatment adherence (insurance instability, transportation barriers)

  • Recent phone call with patient revealed new symptoms not yet in chart

Your staff knows this context. The AI doesn't.

HITL checkpoints let staff add this clinical nuance before documentation is finalized or submitted.

Reason 3: Regulatory and Compliance Requirements

Healthcare organizations answer to HIPAA, Joint Commission, state medical boards, and CMS. Regulators expect human oversight of clinical workflows.


Autonomous AI documentation without physician review creates compliance risk. Auditors ask: "Who verified this documentation was clinically appropriate? Who was accountable?"

HITL provides the answer: Clinical staff reviewed on [date], approved by [name] at [timestamp]. Full audit trail available.

Where to Place HITL Checkpoints

Not every agent action requires human review. You need a framework for deciding where HITL checkpoints are mandatory vs. optional vs. unnecessary.

Mandatory HITL: Before Actions With Clinical or Financial Impact

Clinical documentation finalization

  • AI drafts progress note, discharge summary, procedure note

  • HITL checkpoint: Physician reviews, edits, approves, and signs

  • AI updates EHR with signed note

Prior authorization submission

  • AI generates medical necessity documentation

  • HITL checkpoint: Clinical staff reviews accuracy, approves submission

  • AI submits to payer portal

Appeal generation

  • AI drafts denial appeal with additional evidence

  • HITL checkpoint: Physician reviews appeal rationale, approves submission

  • AI submits appeal

Clinical documentation finalization

  • AI drafts progress note, discharge summary, procedure note

  • HITL checkpoint: Physician reviews, edits, approves, and signs

  • AI updates EHR with signed note

Prior authorization submission

  • AI generates medical necessity documentation

  • HITL checkpoint: Clinical staff reviews accuracy, approves submission

  • AI submits to payer portal

Appeal generation

  • AI drafts denial appeal with additional evidence

  • HITL checkpoint: Physician reviews appeal rationale, approves submission

  • AI submits appeal

Why Mandatory:

These actions enter the medical record, go to external parties, or affect patient care and revenue. Professional accountability required.

Conditional HITL: Based on Confidence or Complexity

Routine prior authorizations with high confidence

  • AI generates documentation for straightforward case (well-documented medical necessity, clear payer criteria match)

  • Confidence score: 0.95

  • HITL approach: Staff spot-checks 10% random sample for quality assurance. Auto-submit remainder after brief review queue hold (2-hour window for staff to flag if needed).

Complex prior authorizations with lower confidence

  • AI generates documentation for edge case (off-label use, ambiguous payer criteria, incomplete patient data)

  • Confidence score: 0.68

  • HITL approach: Mandatory physician review before submission. AI flags complexity factors for physician attention.

Routine prior authorizations with high confidence

  • AI generates documentation for straightforward case (well-documented medical necessity, clear payer criteria match)

  • Confidence score: 0.95

  • HITL approach: Staff spot-checks 10% random sample for quality assurance. Auto-submit remainder after brief review queue hold (2-hour window for staff to flag if needed).

Complex prior authorizations with lower confidence

  • AI generates documentation for edge case (off-label use, ambiguous payer criteria, incomplete patient data)

  • Confidence score: 0.68

  • HITL approach: Mandatory physician review before submission. AI flags complexity factors for physician attention.

Why conditional:

Balances efficiency with oversight. Routine cases get lighter review. Complex cases get mandatory clinical evaluation.

No HITL Required: Automated Monitoring and Data Retrieval

Status tracking

  • AI monitors payer portal for authorization status updates

  • Auto-updates EHR tracking fields when status changes

  • No HITL: Fully automated. Staff receives notification when status changes to "approved" or "denied."

Data retrieval

  • AI retrieves patient clinical data from EHR for synthesis

  • No HITL: Data retrieval is read-only operation. No documentation created or submitted.

Status tracking

  • AI monitors payer portal for authorization status updates

  • Auto-updates EHR tracking fields when status changes

  • No HITL: Fully automated. Staff receives notification when status changes to "approved" or "denied."

Data retrieval

  • AI retrieves patient clinical data from EHR for synthesis

  • No HITL: Data retrieval is read-only operation. No documentation created or submitted.

Why no HITL:

No clinical judgment required. No external submissions. No risk.

Who Reviews What
(Physician vs. Staff vs. Automated)

Who Reviews What
(Physician vs. Staff vs. Automated)

Who Reviews What
(Physician vs. Staff vs. Automated)

Not all HITL checkpoints require physician review. You need role-appropriate oversight.

Workflow

Reviewer

Why

Prior Authorization

Clinical staff

Reviewed by - Clinical staff

Understand documentation and payer requirements

Why - Understand documentation and payer requirements

Prior Authorization (Complex)

Physician

Reviewed by - Physician

Requires clinical judgment on appropriateness

Why - Requires clinical judgment on appropriateness

Clinical Documentation

Physician

Reviewed by - Physician

Only physicians sign notes. Professional accountability.

Why - Only physicians sign notes. Professional accountability.

Denial Appeal

Physician

Reviewed by - Physician

Clinical rationale needed. Physician decides if warranted.

Why - Clinical rationale needed. Physician decides if warranted.

Medical Coding

Certified coder

Reviewed by - Certified coder

Specialized billing knowledge required

Why - Specialized billing knowledge required

Appointment Scheduling

Automated

Reviewed by - Automated

Low risk. Patient can reschedule if needed.

Why - Low risk. Patient can reschedule if needed.

Common HITL Mistakes to Avoid

Common HITL Mistakes to Avoid

Mistake 1: Making HITL Too Burdensome

Staff must click through five screens, manually verify every clinical fact, and write justification for approval.

Result: Staff bypass HITL by rubber-stamping approvals without review.

Fix: One-screen review interface. Source citations inline. One-click approval for accurate output.

Mistake 2: Requiring Physician Review for Everything

Every prior authorization requires physician approval, even routine cases.

Result: Physicians overwhelmed, approvals delayed, no time savings realized.

Fix: Tiered review. Staff handles routine cases. Physicians review complex/high-risk only.

Mistake 3: No Escalation Path

Staff expected to review all cases, even those requiring clinical expertise beyond their scope.

Result: Staff approves inappropriate documentation because they don't know better, or everything goes to physician, defeating purpose of AI.

Fix: Clear escalation triggers. Edge cases route automatically to appropriate expertise level.

Mistake 4: No Feedback Loop

Staff reviews and edits AI output, but edits don't improve AI over time..

Result: Staff makes same corrections repeatedly. AI doesn't learn.

Fix: Track edit patterns. If staff consistently removes certain types of information or adds specific context, update AI logic.

Mistake 5: Treating HITL as Obstacle to Automation

A mindset that says: "HITL slows us down. Goal is to eliminate human review eventually."

Result: Push toward autonomous AI without safety controls. Clinical staff distrust. Compliance risk.

Fix: Embrace HITL as enabling automation. Without human oversight, you can't deploy AI in healthcare. HITL is what makes AI safe and compliant.