Healthcare AI Evaluation
We build evaluation infrastructure for healthcare AI. Measurement systems that give you continuous, domain-specific evidence that your AI performs safely and accurately
The Evaluation Gap
Agentic AI tools are increasingly used for clinical and administrative workflows, in tasks such as prior authorization, medical coding and clinical documentation. However, most deployments rely on vendor claims of accuracy and limited internal validation.
An eval infrastructure is crucial to ensure the agent is working as designed and instructed. It tells you how often it is right / wrong. It tells you what kind of wrong. And it also traces each failure back to a cause that can actually be fixed. Some of the key steps in the evaluation process are building a golden dataset with clinical SMEs, creating a failure taxonomy, establishing a domain-specific rubric, and calibrated AI judges/scorers.
The Diagnostic
Every engagement starts here.
We map your current evaluation infrastructure against five tiers based on
how rigorously your organization can measure whether its AI is actually working,
rather than what AI you have deployed or how many pilots are running.
What we do
Got questions
How is this different from RPA or workflow automation?
What percentage of cases do agents handle autonomously?
Do agents replace clinical or administrative staff?
How long before agents are handling real workload?
Can we start with one workflow and expand?








