
Healthcare LLM Landscape
Healthcare AI Market
Healthcare AI market reached $26.57 billion in 2024 and will reach $187.69 billion by 2030. 79% of healthcare organizations already use AI technology in some form!
Categories of LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming clinical and administrative workflows. The LLM ecosystem is quite diverse, offering various architectural approaches, each with its own set of trade-offs on cost, data control, and use cases. Wrote this article to share my thoughts on how I look at them. They fall into the three broad categories.
1. Proprietary models via commercial cloud APIs (Fastest Time to Value)
Example vendors: Microsoft (via Azure Foundry): GPT-4, GPT-4o, Anthropic, Google: Gemini, MedLM etc.
Characteristics
General purpose models trained on broad datasets, medical specific AI models such as Google MedLM and MS MedImageInsight
Accessed via APIs
Strong general reasoning capabilities
No direct HIPAA compliance - require cloud provider deployment
Trade-offs
Data control: While some vendors offer limited controls, major vendors offer BAA covering both state of the art (SOTA) LLM models and medical domain specific models
Customization: Low, prompt engineering with RAG and limited fine tuning
Technical expertise: Low
2. Open-Source/Medically-Tuned Models
Examples: Meditron-70B, BioMistral-7B, ClinicalBERT, OpenBioLLM
Characteristics
Built on Llama, Mistral, or BERT architectures
Fine-tuned on PubMed, clinical guidelines, medical texts
Deployable on-premises or private cloud
Apache or similar open licenses
Performance
Meditron-70B: 77.6% accuracy on MedQA
BioMistral-7B: 57.3% average accuracy across 10 medical benchmarks
OpenBioLLM: 86.06% average on biomedical datasets
Trade-offs
Data control: Full, complete organizational control
Customization: High, can fine-tune for specific needs
Cost: No licensing fees, but infrastructure required
Technical expertise: High, needs ML engineering team
Limitations
Lack clinical safety validation
Most warn against production use without extensive testing
3. Customer-Specific/Platform Models
Examples: Aidoc CARE/aiOS, Epic Cosmos, Microsoft Healthcare AI, AWS HealthScribe
Characteristics
Complete platforms with models, orchestration, and governance
Pre-built healthcare workflows
FDA clearances (where applicable)
Enterprise support
Platform examples
Aidoc (Purpose build LLM models and a workflow platform)
Microsoft DAX Copilot (Ambient AI transcription)
Siemens AI-Rad (AI powered workflows)
Trade-offs
Data control: Moderate, HIPAA-compliant hosting
Customization: Moderate, pre-built modules
Cost: Subscription-based, enterprise pricing
Technical expertise: Moderate
Some of the popular medical models
LLM Models I have looked into

Regulatory Status
Note, as of Sep 2025 no LLM has FDA clearance as a medical device yet
950+ AI-enabled medical devices FDA-approved (221 in 2024)
HIPAA compliance requires cloud provider deployment for proprietary models
Clinical validation remains primary barrier
Selection Criteria
Use case complexity: Simple tasks use APIs; complex workflows need platforms
Data sensitivity: PHI requires HIPAA compliance
Integration needs: Consider EHR/PACS compatibility
Customization requirements: Open-source for maximum flexibility
Total cost: Balance API costs vs infrastructure investment
Clinical validation: Prioritize validated models for patient-facing applications
Implementation Recommendations
Start with
Administrative use cases (lower risk)
Cloud deployment (Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex)
Human-in-the-loop workflows
Comprehensive testing protocols
Build toward
Clinical applications
Multimodal integration
Agentic AI systems
Real-time decision support
Architecture Guidelines
Infrastructure
Cloud-first with HIPAA BAAs
FHIR-compliant data architecture
TLS 1.2+, OAuth 2.0
Comprehensive audit logging
Governance
AI oversight committee
Risk management framework
Bias assessment protocols
Continuous monitoring
Selection framework (HIMSS Five Rights)
Right patient
Right time
Right information
Right format
Right purpose
Conclusion
Healthcare organizations must choose between three paths: proprietary models for quick deployment, open-source for control and customization, or platforms for integrated solutions. Success depends on matching technology to organizational capabilities, regulatory requirements, and clinical needs. Start with low-risk applications, establish governance, then expand to clinical use cases.
References
Grand View Research. (2024). AI In Healthcare Market Size, Share & Industry Report, 2030.
Aisera. (2024). Large Language Models in Healthcare: Medical LLM Use Cases.
Analytics Vidhya. (2024). Llama-3-Based OpenBioLLM Models Outperform GPT-4 and Med-PaLM.
CDO Magazine. (2024). Google Announces Med-Gemini AI Models for Healthcare Use.
Fierce Healthcare. (2024). Google unveils MedLM generative AI models for healthcare.
Harvard Medical School. (2025). Open-Source AI Matches Top Proprietary LLM in Solving Tough Medical Cases.
HIPAA Journal. (2025). Is ChatGPT HIPAA Compliant? Updated for 2025.
Hugging Face. (2024). BioMistral-7B Model Card.
Hugging Face. (2024). Meditron-70B Model Card.
MedTech Dive. (2024). The number of AI medical devices has spiked in the past decade.
Meta AI. (2024). Meditron: An LLM suite for low-resource medical settings leveraging Meta Llama.
Microsoft. (2024). DAX Copilot: Healthcare innovation that refocuses on the clinician-patient connection.
Microsoft. (2024). Unlocking next-generation AI capabilities with healthcare AI models.
Nature Digital Medicine. (2025). Implementing large language models in healthcare while balancing control, collaboration, costs and security.
Nebuly. (2024). OpenAI GPT-4 API Pricing Guide.
OSF HealthCare/Fabric Health. (2024). Case Study: $2.4 million ROI with AI-powered virtual assistant.
PubMed Central. (2024). Beyond ChatGPT: What does GPT-4 add to healthcare? The dawn of a new era.
PubMed Central. (2024). Evaluating multimodal AI in medical diagnostics.
Stanford HAI. (2024). Large Language Models in Healthcare: Are We There Yet?
The Lancet Digital Health. (2024). A future role for health applications of large language models depends on regulators enforcing safety standards.
Healthcare AI Market
Healthcare AI market reached $26.57 billion in 2024 and will reach $187.69 billion by 2030. 79% of healthcare organizations already use AI technology in some form!
Categories of LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming clinical and administrative workflows. The LLM ecosystem is quite diverse, offering various architectural approaches, each with its own set of trade-offs on cost, data control, and use cases. Wrote this article to share my thoughts on how I look at them. They fall into the three broad categories.
1. Proprietary models via commercial cloud APIs (Fastest Time to Value)
Example vendors: Microsoft (via Azure Foundry): GPT-4, GPT-4o, Anthropic, Google: Gemini, MedLM etc.
Characteristics
General purpose models trained on broad datasets, medical specific AI models such as Google MedLM and MS MedImageInsight
Accessed via APIs
Strong general reasoning capabilities
No direct HIPAA compliance - require cloud provider deployment
Trade-offs
Data control: While some vendors offer limited controls, major vendors offer BAA covering both state of the art (SOTA) LLM models and medical domain specific models
Customization: Low, prompt engineering with RAG and limited fine tuning
Technical expertise: Low
2. Open-Source/Medically-Tuned Models
Examples: Meditron-70B, BioMistral-7B, ClinicalBERT, OpenBioLLM
Characteristics
Built on Llama, Mistral, or BERT architectures
Fine-tuned on PubMed, clinical guidelines, medical texts
Deployable on-premises or private cloud
Apache or similar open licenses
Performance
Meditron-70B: 77.6% accuracy on MedQA
BioMistral-7B: 57.3% average accuracy across 10 medical benchmarks
OpenBioLLM: 86.06% average on biomedical datasets
Trade-offs
Data control: Full, complete organizational control
Customization: High, can fine-tune for specific needs
Cost: No licensing fees, but infrastructure required
Technical expertise: High, needs ML engineering team
Limitations
Lack clinical safety validation
Most warn against production use without extensive testing
3. Customer-Specific/Platform Models
Examples: Aidoc CARE/aiOS, Epic Cosmos, Microsoft Healthcare AI, AWS HealthScribe
Characteristics
Complete platforms with models, orchestration, and governance
Pre-built healthcare workflows
FDA clearances (where applicable)
Enterprise support
Platform examples
Aidoc (Purpose build LLM models and a workflow platform)
Microsoft DAX Copilot (Ambient AI transcription)
Siemens AI-Rad (AI powered workflows)
Trade-offs
Data control: Moderate, HIPAA-compliant hosting
Customization: Moderate, pre-built modules
Cost: Subscription-based, enterprise pricing
Technical expertise: Moderate
Some of the popular medical models
LLM Models I have looked into

Regulatory Status
Note, as of Sep 2025 no LLM has FDA clearance as a medical device yet
950+ AI-enabled medical devices FDA-approved (221 in 2024)
HIPAA compliance requires cloud provider deployment for proprietary models
Clinical validation remains primary barrier
Selection Criteria
Use case complexity: Simple tasks use APIs; complex workflows need platforms
Data sensitivity: PHI requires HIPAA compliance
Integration needs: Consider EHR/PACS compatibility
Customization requirements: Open-source for maximum flexibility
Total cost: Balance API costs vs infrastructure investment
Clinical validation: Prioritize validated models for patient-facing applications
Implementation Recommendations
Start with
Administrative use cases (lower risk)
Cloud deployment (Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex)
Human-in-the-loop workflows
Comprehensive testing protocols
Build toward
Clinical applications
Multimodal integration
Agentic AI systems
Real-time decision support
Architecture Guidelines
Infrastructure
Cloud-first with HIPAA BAAs
FHIR-compliant data architecture
TLS 1.2+, OAuth 2.0
Comprehensive audit logging
Governance
AI oversight committee
Risk management framework
Bias assessment protocols
Continuous monitoring
Selection framework (HIMSS Five Rights)
Right patient
Right time
Right information
Right format
Right purpose
Conclusion
Healthcare organizations must choose between three paths: proprietary models for quick deployment, open-source for control and customization, or platforms for integrated solutions. Success depends on matching technology to organizational capabilities, regulatory requirements, and clinical needs. Start with low-risk applications, establish governance, then expand to clinical use cases.
References
Grand View Research. (2024). AI In Healthcare Market Size, Share & Industry Report, 2030.
Aisera. (2024). Large Language Models in Healthcare: Medical LLM Use Cases.
Analytics Vidhya. (2024). Llama-3-Based OpenBioLLM Models Outperform GPT-4 and Med-PaLM.
CDO Magazine. (2024). Google Announces Med-Gemini AI Models for Healthcare Use.
Fierce Healthcare. (2024). Google unveils MedLM generative AI models for healthcare.
Harvard Medical School. (2025). Open-Source AI Matches Top Proprietary LLM in Solving Tough Medical Cases.
HIPAA Journal. (2025). Is ChatGPT HIPAA Compliant? Updated for 2025.
Hugging Face. (2024). BioMistral-7B Model Card.
Hugging Face. (2024). Meditron-70B Model Card.
MedTech Dive. (2024). The number of AI medical devices has spiked in the past decade.
Meta AI. (2024). Meditron: An LLM suite for low-resource medical settings leveraging Meta Llama.
Microsoft. (2024). DAX Copilot: Healthcare innovation that refocuses on the clinician-patient connection.
Microsoft. (2024). Unlocking next-generation AI capabilities with healthcare AI models.
Nature Digital Medicine. (2025). Implementing large language models in healthcare while balancing control, collaboration, costs and security.
Nebuly. (2024). OpenAI GPT-4 API Pricing Guide.
OSF HealthCare/Fabric Health. (2024). Case Study: $2.4 million ROI with AI-powered virtual assistant.
PubMed Central. (2024). Beyond ChatGPT: What does GPT-4 add to healthcare? The dawn of a new era.
PubMed Central. (2024). Evaluating multimodal AI in medical diagnostics.
Stanford HAI. (2024). Large Language Models in Healthcare: Are We There Yet?
The Lancet Digital Health. (2024). A future role for health applications of large language models depends on regulators enforcing safety standards.
Healthcare AI Market
Healthcare AI market reached $26.57 billion in 2024 and will reach $187.69 billion by 2030. 79% of healthcare organizations already use AI technology in some form!
Categories of LLMs
Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming clinical and administrative workflows. The LLM ecosystem is quite diverse, offering various architectural approaches, each with its own set of trade-offs on cost, data control, and use cases. Wrote this article to share my thoughts on how I look at them. They fall into the three broad categories.
1. Proprietary models via commercial cloud APIs (Fastest Time to Value)
Example vendors: Microsoft (via Azure Foundry): GPT-4, GPT-4o, Anthropic, Google: Gemini, MedLM etc.
Characteristics
General purpose models trained on broad datasets, medical specific AI models such as Google MedLM and MS MedImageInsight
Accessed via APIs
Strong general reasoning capabilities
No direct HIPAA compliance - require cloud provider deployment
Trade-offs
Data control: While some vendors offer limited controls, major vendors offer BAA covering both state of the art (SOTA) LLM models and medical domain specific models
Customization: Low, prompt engineering with RAG and limited fine tuning
Technical expertise: Low
2. Open-Source/Medically-Tuned Models
Examples: Meditron-70B, BioMistral-7B, ClinicalBERT, OpenBioLLM
Characteristics
Built on Llama, Mistral, or BERT architectures
Fine-tuned on PubMed, clinical guidelines, medical texts
Deployable on-premises or private cloud
Apache or similar open licenses
Performance
Meditron-70B: 77.6% accuracy on MedQA
BioMistral-7B: 57.3% average accuracy across 10 medical benchmarks
OpenBioLLM: 86.06% average on biomedical datasets
Trade-offs
Data control: Full, complete organizational control
Customization: High, can fine-tune for specific needs
Cost: No licensing fees, but infrastructure required
Technical expertise: High, needs ML engineering team
Limitations
Lack clinical safety validation
Most warn against production use without extensive testing
3. Customer-Specific/Platform Models
Examples: Aidoc CARE/aiOS, Epic Cosmos, Microsoft Healthcare AI, AWS HealthScribe
Characteristics
Complete platforms with models, orchestration, and governance
Pre-built healthcare workflows
FDA clearances (where applicable)
Enterprise support
Platform examples
Aidoc (Purpose build LLM models and a workflow platform)
Microsoft DAX Copilot (Ambient AI transcription)
Siemens AI-Rad (AI powered workflows)
Trade-offs
Data control: Moderate, HIPAA-compliant hosting
Customization: Moderate, pre-built modules
Cost: Subscription-based, enterprise pricing
Technical expertise: Moderate
Some of the popular medical models
LLM Models I have looked into

Regulatory Status
Note, as of Sep 2025 no LLM has FDA clearance as a medical device yet
950+ AI-enabled medical devices FDA-approved (221 in 2024)
HIPAA compliance requires cloud provider deployment for proprietary models
Clinical validation remains primary barrier
Selection Criteria
Use case complexity: Simple tasks use APIs; complex workflows need platforms
Data sensitivity: PHI requires HIPAA compliance
Integration needs: Consider EHR/PACS compatibility
Customization requirements: Open-source for maximum flexibility
Total cost: Balance API costs vs infrastructure investment
Clinical validation: Prioritize validated models for patient-facing applications
Implementation Recommendations
Start with
Administrative use cases (lower risk)
Cloud deployment (Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Google Vertex)
Human-in-the-loop workflows
Comprehensive testing protocols
Build toward
Clinical applications
Multimodal integration
Agentic AI systems
Real-time decision support
Architecture Guidelines
Infrastructure
Cloud-first with HIPAA BAAs
FHIR-compliant data architecture
TLS 1.2+, OAuth 2.0
Comprehensive audit logging
Governance
AI oversight committee
Risk management framework
Bias assessment protocols
Continuous monitoring
Selection framework (HIMSS Five Rights)
Right patient
Right time
Right information
Right format
Right purpose
Conclusion
Healthcare organizations must choose between three paths: proprietary models for quick deployment, open-source for control and customization, or platforms for integrated solutions. Success depends on matching technology to organizational capabilities, regulatory requirements, and clinical needs. Start with low-risk applications, establish governance, then expand to clinical use cases.
References
Grand View Research. (2024). AI In Healthcare Market Size, Share & Industry Report, 2030.
Aisera. (2024). Large Language Models in Healthcare: Medical LLM Use Cases.
Analytics Vidhya. (2024). Llama-3-Based OpenBioLLM Models Outperform GPT-4 and Med-PaLM.
CDO Magazine. (2024). Google Announces Med-Gemini AI Models for Healthcare Use.
Fierce Healthcare. (2024). Google unveils MedLM generative AI models for healthcare.
Harvard Medical School. (2025). Open-Source AI Matches Top Proprietary LLM in Solving Tough Medical Cases.
HIPAA Journal. (2025). Is ChatGPT HIPAA Compliant? Updated for 2025.
Hugging Face. (2024). BioMistral-7B Model Card.
Hugging Face. (2024). Meditron-70B Model Card.
MedTech Dive. (2024). The number of AI medical devices has spiked in the past decade.
Meta AI. (2024). Meditron: An LLM suite for low-resource medical settings leveraging Meta Llama.
Microsoft. (2024). DAX Copilot: Healthcare innovation that refocuses on the clinician-patient connection.
Microsoft. (2024). Unlocking next-generation AI capabilities with healthcare AI models.
Nature Digital Medicine. (2025). Implementing large language models in healthcare while balancing control, collaboration, costs and security.
Nebuly. (2024). OpenAI GPT-4 API Pricing Guide.
OSF HealthCare/Fabric Health. (2024). Case Study: $2.4 million ROI with AI-powered virtual assistant.
PubMed Central. (2024). Beyond ChatGPT: What does GPT-4 add to healthcare? The dawn of a new era.
PubMed Central. (2024). Evaluating multimodal AI in medical diagnostics.
Stanford HAI. (2024). Large Language Models in Healthcare: Are We There Yet?
The Lancet Digital Health. (2024). A future role for health applications of large language models depends on regulators enforcing safety standards.